Company governance
Decision Queue
One company-wide register for choices that need evidence, discussion and an accountable conclusion. Each item states the actual question, a recommended starting point, what evidence closes it and the source that created it.
Frame
Agree on the exact decision—not merely the surrounding topic.
Challenge
Review the recommendation, risks, alternatives and missing evidence.
Decide
Name the accountable decision-maker, decision and effective date.
Propagate
Update the source document, roadmap, owner and dependent work.
1 of 31 decisions shown
P2DR-029BrandEvidence requiredDefine the visual range for Provider categories
Should category portals feel distinct or remain one uniform Registry interface?
BrandEvidence required
Define the visual range for Provider categories
Should category portals feel distinct or remain one uniform Registry interface?
Why this matters
Storage, delivery, photography, trades and vendors have different workflows, but excessive visual variation weakens reuse and makes the product harder to learn.
Recommended starting point
Keep one black-and-white Registry system with category-specific operational modules, language and evidence—not separate visual products.
Evidence required to close
Provider dashboard prototypes for storage, white-glove delivery and vendors using the same component system.
- Decision owner
- Brand + Product
- Required timing
- During Provider portal design
Closure standard
A discussion is not a decision until the source changes.
01Decision and rationale recorded02Named accountable owner03Effective date and review date04Source document updated05Roadmap or budget impact applied06Affected people notified07Evidence or assumptions attached08Superseded choice preserved