Company governance
Decision Queue
One company-wide register for choices that need evidence, discussion and an accountable conclusion. Each item states the actual question, a recommended starting point, what evidence closes it and the source that created it.
Frame
Agree on the exact decision—not merely the surrounding topic.
Challenge
Review the recommendation, risks, alternatives and missing evidence.
Decide
Name the accountable decision-maker, decision and effective date.
Propagate
Update the source document, roadmap, owner and dependent work.
1 of 31 decisions shown
P1DR-026FinanceEvidence requiredSet product and procurement economics
What net contribution should the Registry earn on furniture, materials and procurement workflows?
FinanceEvidence required
Set product and procurement economics
What net contribution should the Registry earn on furniture, materials and procurement workflows?
Why this matters
A 15% furniture contribution and other category economics have been discussed, but the new model includes multiple vendors and different fulfilment responsibilities.
Recommended starting point
Model gross margin separately from procurement/service fees; approve rates by category only after returns, damage, payment cost and labour are included.
Evidence required to close
Three transaction examples per category and reconciled contribution-margin calculation.
- Decision owner
- Finance + Operations
- Required timing
- Before product transactions launch
- Source
- Business Plan 4.0 →
Closure standard
A discussion is not a decision until the source changes.
01Decision and rationale recorded02Named accountable owner03Effective date and review date04Source document updated05Roadmap or budget impact applied06Affected people notified07Evidence or assumptions attached08Superseded choice preserved