Company governance
Decision Queue
One company-wide register for choices that need evidence, discussion and an accountable conclusion. Each item states the actual question, a recommended starting point, what evidence closes it and the source that created it.
Frame
Agree on the exact decision—not merely the surrounding topic.
Challenge
Review the recommendation, risks, alternatives and missing evidence.
Decide
Name the accountable decision-maker, decision and effective date.
Propagate
Update the source document, roadmap, owner and dependent work.
3 of 31 decisions shown
P0DR-015OperationsReady to discussApprove Provider quality standards by category
What minimum evidence, insurance, service standards and review cadence are required for each Provider Category?
OperationsReady to discuss
Approve Provider quality standards by category
What minimum evidence, insurance, service standards and review cadence are required for each Provider Category?
Why this matters
The Registry promise depends on a vetted network, yet qualification cannot be one generic checklist across vendors, storage, delivery, trades and creative services.
Recommended starting point
Create a global trust baseline plus category-specific qualification, expiry and suspension rules; do not mark a Provider active until both pass.
Evidence required to close
Approved matrix for all nine categories, application mappings and re-verification cadence.
- Decision owner
- Provider Operations
- Required timing
- Before approving production Provider accounts
P1DR-016OperationsReady to discussSet cross-party service levels
What response and update standards apply to Offers, quotes, receiving, damage, storage release, delivery and installation?
OperationsReady to discuss
Set cross-party service levels
What response and update standards apply to Offers, quotes, receiving, damage, storage release, delivery and installation?
Why this matters
Designers will only trust the shared system if Provider status is current and exceptions are handled predictably.
Recommended starting point
Define category-specific response targets, automatic reminders, escalation owners and visible exception states rather than one generic SLA.
Evidence required to close
Provider-reviewed SLA table and two real workflow simulations.
- Decision owner
- Provider Operations
- Required timing
- Before Provider pilots
P1DR-017OperationsEvidence requiredDefine damage, claims and service-recovery ownership
Who records, investigates, communicates and financially resolves damage or failed delivery at each handoff?
OperationsEvidence required
Define damage, claims and service-recovery ownership
Who records, investigates, communicates and financially resolves damage or failed delivery at each handoff?
Why this matters
Receiving, storage, delivery and installation evidence crosses several independent businesses and can expose the Registry brand.
Recommended starting point
Use timestamped condition evidence and chain of custody, with one Registry case owner and contract-defined commercial responsibility by handoff.
Evidence required to close
Counsel-reviewed claims workflow, required insurance and a simulated damaged-Item case.
- Decision owner
- Operations + Legal + Finance
- Required timing
- Before physical-goods workflows go live
Closure standard
A discussion is not a decision until the source changes.
01Decision and rationale recorded02Named accountable owner03Effective date and review date04Source document updated05Roadmap or budget impact applied06Affected people notified07Evidence or assumptions attached08Superseded choice preserved